In a recent piece for the New York Post, author Maureen Callahan sheds light on accusations against Brad Pitt for allegedly attempting to 'demonize' Angelina Jolie in a manner reminiscent of his past actions towards Jennifer Aniston.
Drawing parallels between the two situations, Callahan points out that Pitt, despite being perceived as a 'nice guy,' faced criticism for how he portrayed Aniston after their split, tarnishing her public image.
The article highlights instances where Pitt reportedly blamed Aniston for issues in their marriage, called her boring, and suggested she was a vain, selfish career woman preventing him from having the family he desired.
Callahan also references a 2011 interview in which Pitt seemingly shifted blame onto Aniston for the lack of excitement in his life, stating, "I think that my marriage [to actress Jennifer Aniston] had something to do with it."
The author raises questions about Pitt's consistency in facing consequences for his actions, citing his delayed response to addressing the houses he built for Katrina victims. Despite these controversies, the article notes that public sentiment may still lean towards defending Pitt and blaming Jolie for any negative perceptions, viewing his actions as a potential one-time occurrence rather than a pattern.
As the story unfolds, it remains to be seen how these allegations will impact Brad Pitt's public image and the ongoing narrative surrounding his relationships with both Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie.
